<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carl Conrad &#187; widgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carlconrad.net/en/category/internet/web-browsing/widgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carlconrad.net/en</link>
	<description>Marketing, technology, my views and thoughts on today&#039;s digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Do I need ubiquitous access to my pictures?</title>
		<link>http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2007/05/do-i-need-ubiquitous-access-to-my-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2007/05/do-i-need-ubiquitous-access-to-my-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 03:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photo sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KoffeePhoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KoffeeWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlconrad.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/do-i-need-ubiquitous-access-to-my-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do I (really) need ubiquitous access to my pictures? Asking this question may sound weird but let&#8217;s go into the details. Not so long ago, your pictures were probably stored in a shoebox, some of them in photo albums. Photo sharing took place when relatives came home or when, back to work, chatting at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I (really) need ubiquitous access to my pictures? Asking this question may sound weird but let&#8217;s go into the details.</p>
<p>Not so long ago, your pictures were probably stored in a shoebox, some of them in photo albums. Photo sharing took place when relatives came home or when, back to work, chatting at the coffee machine&#8230; Nobody even thought of carrying one&#8217;s own photo library at any time or sharing them with anybody down the street.</p>
<p>This has changed in the digital world. As other digitalized media, a picture is not a piece of material any more. A picture now consists of a couple of bytes stored on a local or remote hard drive that can easily be linked to. This has completely changed our relation to the pictures, but did it change our relation to people, to relatives?</p>
<p>We need to consider two kinds of relation to people here. Relation to people I know, and, relation to people I may not know.</p>
<p>Relation to people I know, let&#8217;s call them relatives, is based on sharing &#8211; sharing emotions, ideas, pictures&#8230; But in a managed way &#8211; I know who I talk to and with whom I want to share pictures.</p>
<p>Relation to people I may not know is based on discovering. Here, rather than sharing, I may be willing to publish what I want others to know about me, my interests, my ideas, my works, in order to create new relations.</p>
<p>We have here two specific needs. At <a href="http://www.koffeeware.com/en/">KoffeeWare</a>, we chose to address the relation with relatives first. With relatives, we are on a long term relation and ready to share a lot. An example, your last kid, you don&#8217;t want to have to chose which picture to share with them. You want to show them a lot of pictures, more than a lot&#8230; And new ones, as often as possible. The digital life also simplifies sharing as it does not require to meet them, we don&#8217;t have to wait to share.</p>
<p>More, we think the digital life does not have to impose technologies. Your relatives should be able to watch the pictures using whatever means they like: web pages, mobile phone, personalized home pages, and so on.</p>
<p>Last, thanks to the digital format, pictures are easy to store. A photo sharing solution should also provide a long term storage solution. Because it is good to know the pictures are safe from any failure that may end up in losing them.</p>
<p>This is what we are heading to with recent developments on <a href="http://www.koffeephoto.com/en/">KoffeePhoto</a>. Not only can you access your pictures from any computer, but you can install a digital frame on your iGoogle or Netvibes personalized home page and you can even access and share your albums while meeting someone in the street using your mobile phone.</p>
<p>So, do I need ubiquitous access to my pictures? True photo sharing requires it.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="KoffeePhoto photo sharing" href="http://www.koffeephoto.com/en/photo-sharing/">KoffeePhoto photo sharing</a></li>
<li><a title="KoffeePhoto mobile" href="http://www.koffeephoto.com/en/mobile-photo-sharing/">KoffeePhoto mobile</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2007/12/the-beauty-of-old-digital-pictures/" rel="bookmark" title="31/12/2007">The beauty of old digital pictures</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2008/02/digital-cameras-connect-to-photo-sharing/" rel="bookmark" title="04/02/2008">PMA08: digital cameras connect to photo sharing (at last)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2008/09/ever-heard-about-media-rss/" rel="bookmark" title="08/09/2008">Ever heard about Media RSS?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2008/05/eye-fi-adds-geotagging-of-photos/" rel="bookmark" title="13/05/2008">Eye-Fi adds and automates geotagging of photos</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2009/04/do-you-aka-aki/" rel="bookmark" title="10/04/2009">Do you aka-aki?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.898 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carlconrad.net/en/2007/05/do-i-need-ubiquitous-access-to-my-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

